Sunday, October 5, 2014

History Behind the News: Nuclear Power in Japan

Last Tuesday, we shared news stories that we collected from various sources in class. Many of us brought in news about the student demonstrations in Hong Kong, and diplomatic relationships between the Japanese Prime Minister, Abe Shinzô, and the Chinese President, Xi Jiping. We'll explore this interest in regional politics, from the street-level protests to diplomatic-level negotiations, in our class tomorrow.
We also shared many questions and concerns about freedom of information in the Japanese press, sparked by an article about Yoshida Masao, plant manager of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant during the crisis after the March 11, 2011 earthquake and tsunami. Recently released transcripts of Yoshida's testimony reveal that the now deceased nuclear engineer fears about the situation at the nuclear power plant were quite acute. I hope we can discuss more about the relationship between secret and open information, in particular in light of controversial new legislation to protect state secrets.

Guided by an academic article we read on the subject before class, Tuesday's main "history behind the news" discussion was on nuclear politics in Japan.

We reviewed the timeline of events key to the development of nuclear power in Japan, and saw how that history included both international and domestic pressures. Also notable was the ongoing tension between anti-nuclear activism and pro-nuclear energy pressures.

Here is the timeline about nuclear power we came up with in class:

1945: Nuclear bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki
1945-1952: The Allied Occupation of Japan
1952: Ban on nuclear power in Japan lifted
1954: Nakasone Yasuhiro requests yen from the National Diet for nuclear research. In March, the "Lucky Dragon Incident" strengthens popular resistance to nuclear power, but the Diet budgets money for nuclear research.
1955-1965: Japan shifts from relying almost entirely upon coal to generate electricity to using more and more oil.
1973: First "oil shock"
mid-1970s: Opinion polls in Japan show that 70 percent of residents supported Japan's continued nuclear power program
1979: Second "oil shock"
1980: Three Mile Island Accident. In November, opinion polls in Japan show that only 30 percent of residents supported Japan's continued nuclear power program.

The article we read showed how the local politics of Kaminoseki, Japan led to the building of nuclear power plant there, in spite of a general wariness of nuclear power in the early 1980s. The story of how communities allow nuclear power plants, a "public bad," to be built had to do with local economies and the pressures put on them, which were also linked with global movements (such as the political control of oil, as we saw).

This history helps us understand how Japan can have a "nuclear allergy" and yet also continue a nuclear power program. This is the history behind the news about restarting nuclear power plants in Japan now.


10 comments:

  1. I often watch morning soap operas, but I didn't know "Hatoko's Sea". When I read this article, I wanted to watch it.
    According to last week's assignment, I could understand how nuclear power generation was introduced into Japan. I think that restarting nuclear power plants shouldn't carry out yet, because Japan is only country to have experienced atomic bombs, and Japanese know how dreadful nuclear power is.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Although I did not have known this drama,I feel that nuclear power(weapon) can violated directly humanity.we can guess"It is natural that those who people are suffered from atomic bomb exist thousands"
    However It is a fact that nuclear power can generate a vast electric power. In my opinion. It is early to abolish completely all nuclear power plants of japan.
    I believe more and more people should argue about nuclear power both humanity and economics.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I understand Japanese history of a nuclear power .
    I think we had forgot a nuclear power’sdanger until FUKUSIMA accident happened. Now we know this danger,so I think we should discuss a nuclear power carefully. In my opinion, certainly, a nuclear power is dangerous, but it is a fact that this has been useful. A thermal power plant is expected to be an alternative,but it has a lot of problems. Therefore, I think we cannot help using a nuclear power until what can take the place of a nuclear power is invented.

    Masayoshi

    ReplyDelete
  5. Thank you for posting.
    Last class, we discussed the student's demonstration in Hong Kong,but I was able to join in the discussion because I didn't know a lot about this problem.Therefore,I want to learn about Hong Kong's history and relationship between China and Hong Kong from a lot of news articles and various point of view. By studying HongKong's problem,I also want to think of democracy.
    "Hatoko no umi" surprised me ,becouse this article can teach the history about nuclear politics in Japan that I didn't know. I learned that the new plan to build nuclear plant was promoted by people living in this community rather than the bureaucracy.
    I enjoy this class , Behind the news story, because we can meet what we didn't know. I look forward to next class and meeting 先生 !

    ReplyDelete
  6. Understand→understood

    ReplyDelete
  7. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  8. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Thank you for posting.
    To tell the truth, my bad English skill didn't enable me to understand what you said easily, sorry.
    I'm interested in Japanese nuclear history, because sometimes we discuss about the nuclear issues without historical facts.
    I don't want to have my opinion about the Japanese nuclear issue Fukushima-Daiichi, but your teaching was easy to understand, and I was able to get some points of view.
    I'm looking forward to taking next your class.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Thank you for your posting. I have three things about what we have learned in the last class.
    1 This was the first time to look the problem from historical perspective. In terms of history, I think how people see it is really important. Even if people see the same history, they take it differently. I guess I need see not only the history itself but also how others see it.
    2 This nuclear power topic made me think what people can learn from their experiences and how they can pass it to next generation. New generation who never experienced 3.11 disaster is coming, as I have no idea for war.
    3 Honestly, I could not get the meaning of "nuclear allergy." Does it mean being sensitive about nuclear power?

    Hisako

    ReplyDelete